Tag Archives: socialgraph

Scrabulous taken off Facebook and what it means for developers…

The news is probably stale now: Scrabulous has been taken off Facebook after being sued by Hasbro, the company that owns the IP rights for Scrabble. As I wrote in my previous post just a few days back, the writing was clearly on the wall. Techcrunch reports that Scrabulous is now inaccessible to people in the US & Canada. Initially it was conjectured that Facebook took this decision, now it appears that the application was pulled down by its creators and not Facebook, which is trying to be neutral between the two parties. I am sure this is not the end of the story for Scrabulous…

So what are the lessons here for others to take away? Here’s what’s top of my mind:

Imitation V/s Innovation: Immitation has always been a legitimate part of innovation. Much of what the world regards as innovation has its origin in trying to copy what others are doing. But the catch is that you should not just copy; you also need to improve, to improvise, to add maybe a new dimension or a new use-case. If that happens, the imitation gets legitimacy as a stepping stone in the creation of something that the world would not have otherwise. Scrabulous probably fails on that count… it is simply a web based version of Scrabble; they probably innovated in terms of a new distribution channel for the game (which is not insignificant), but not in terms of the core concept.

Tactics can undo your Strategy: I think the Scrabulous founders made a mistake by naming their application “Scrabulous”, which is clearly a derivative of Scrabble. From a legal standpoint, this establishes intent. People who are making strategic decisions about building products & services that are “me too” or closely resemble other popular concepts are advised not to repeat this tactical mistake – pl avoid name extensions or derivatives.

The Social Graph Application Platform: This is a good example of how fickle social graph applications can be to its developers. The end-users don’t belong to the application developers.. they belong to the platform. Having a steady base of users that you acquired on your own puts you in a commanding position, and there is no substitute for it.

Mass User Exodus Case Study: Scrabulous could be a defining case study in whether mass exodus of users can happen from one product to another, if one suddenly becomes inoperational due to some reasons. In this case, Scrabulous and its equivalent app from Hasbro are almost identical, except their ownership.

From a personal standpoint, this is an acid test for the Kolkata based creators of Scrabulous. They have been smart enough to create an additive “pass-time” for millions of people (albeit on a borrowed concept); lets keep our fingers crossed that they bounce back from this setback.

Update: Scrabulous is now available in a new avatar on Facebook. Its called Wordscraper and it has cosmetic changes from the previous design. Techcrunch reports – “….When Scrabulous was taken down, it had half a million daily active users and Hasbro’s/Electronic Arts’ official Facebook Scrabble game had only about 15,000. Two days later, the official Scrabble beta is up to 63,000 daily active users. Wordscraper has 3,600 daily active users. Now the race is on. Where will the bulk of Scrabulous fans go…. “

Rediff rolls out its API platform for developers…

One of the surprising developments at Proto was the announcement by Rediff (which incidentally was the platinum sponsor for the event) of its developer platform by opening up its APIs. The platform will allow developers to create an applications economy on Rediff on the lines of Facebook & Open Social. The move is laudable – it speaks of Rediff’s confidence in its own engineering prowess, though it can be argued that Rediff hardly has the social graph that is necessary for making this successful. RediffMail is likely to have the largest user base, but other services – iShare, Connexions, Rediffblogs etc have a fragmented usage pattern, something that is not best suited for social graph platforms. Below is a snap from the presentation that Rediff ‘s platform head gave at Proto.

To push the platform, the company has also announced an incentive program for application developers. Interested people can submit their ideas to the company and the best 10 entries stand to get a grant of 250K for building the app.

This move is an indication that the Indian homegrown portals are not going to allow the global biggies to eat the cake out of their hands. While they may not have the technical depth, that a Google or Facebook has, they are willing to take the battle to the middle in protecting their home turf.

So who’s next in line… Indiatimes? Sify? any takers ….

Update:
Manu from TechSutra notes that Rediff has ripped their platform off Facebook completely. This is what he says- “………… Rediff has completely ripped off facebook devloper platform from naming of API to documentation. FBML becomes RBML, FQL becomes RQL. You can compare the documentation of FQL & RQL below.

Forget innovation, rediff can’t be even bothered to write their own documentation. Right now, there are no appplications which rediff has showcased. All they have is the ripped off documentation and a “get in touch” form which asks you for your application ideas. The form says “Terms and conditions” apply but no where can I find the terms and conditions. This has to be the most ridiculous and shameless platform launch ever!…..”

Read his post here.

What do you say- is it bouquets or brickbats for Rediff?